What we focused on in the test
A bicycle saddle test that only asks if it’s comfortable or not is useless. Comfort is subjective and depends on your anatomy, riding position, duration, and bike type. That’s why we worked with specific criteria:
Pressure distribution and sit bone support: A good saddle distributes pressure evenly on the sit bones instead of concentrating it on soft tissue and the perineal area. We checked whether the seating surface actually supports the sit bones and if a cutout relieves the sensitive middle area.
Comfort after 30, 60, and 120 minutes: Every saddle feels different in the first ten minutes compared to after two hours. We deliberately conducted long-term tests because typical problems only appear after 30 to 60 minutes.
What this means for rides over 100 km is explained in our guide bike saddles for long rides.
Material and workmanship: Memory foam adapts differently than standard PU foam. We evaluated material quality, checked workmanship, and observed how the saddles behaved after several weeks.
Riding position as a filter factor: A saddle that’s perfect for upright sitting can be a disaster on a racing bike. That’s why we tested each saddle in the riding position it was designed for:
-
Upright (60 to 90 degrees): City bike, e-bike, Dutch bike – wide saddle, lots of padding
-
Moderate (45 to 60 degrees): Trekking, MTB, gravel – medium width, targeted padding
-
Sporty (under 45 degrees): Road bike, time trial – narrow saddle, minimal padding
Bicycle Saddle Test – Overview of Results